Wouldn't "Breakthrough Engineering" be a great name for an engineering consulting firm?
The idea would be: get a bunch of really smart engineers together who would work on technologies that are "10 years away" and try to overcome the barriers keeping them from being scaled up.
Take superconductors, for example. If we had a national grid made out of superconductors, we'd have a much better grid. In fact, if we don't one day have such a high volume grid, we probably will start experiencing lots of problems pretty soon. More blackouts, expensive electricity.. you get the picture.
Same thing goes for ultracapacitors. If they existed, oh man. Electric cars would be the norm, and they would be cheap, too. The world would be a better place for sure.
Now why, do you ask, would it be better to have a firm full of engineers working on these problems? After all, aren't there already companies trying to do this? Aren't the people who know these technologies the ones best suited to think of solutions?
I'd say: not necessarily. In the same way that management consultants are able to often see how to run a business better than people who may have been running that business their entire lives, a team of exceptionally smart engineers might be able to see solutions that the people who have been scratching their heads for years did not.
Also, from a practicality standpoint, no technology company can afford to hire a think tank full of engineers. Each has its own team, but they have to also hire technicians, accountants, lawyers... what if they could just outsource the brains of the operation to a group of really smart people whose sole job it is to be the brains?
I wonder if this exists already, I just don't know about it.
Friday, April 24, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment